National Working Group:

   

Portugal
   

National Working groups have been organized in Portugal in order to provide the adequate exchange context between public and private spheres, gathering together experts from health fields, Roma issues, and public administrations.

 

This isl contributing to the identification of good practices and health indicators, which are a good tool for health professionals and health agents in their understanding of the day to day work with the Roma Community. Since REAPN during the last years (since 1995) is participating together with FSG and other organisations in Europe in different activities related with Roma issues, we had already a stable working group on Roma issues (related generally with Poverty and Social Exclusion).

 

In the context of the Sastipen Project, we had to enlarge this inter-institutional group and to mobilize particularly institutions coming from the Health sector. As we’ve said previously, taking in consideration the political national context, this was not an easy task. Between April and September, parallel with gathering of information for the data-base we held different contacts and informal meetings with different organisations trying to involve them in this project. In September the first meeting of a more formal group took place.

 

The Working Group meetings are important moments of debate and exchange of experiences and planning the activities. As the national working group had a previous existence we had had the opportunity and in the scope of its general activities to develop specific activities where we introduced the theme of the Sastipen Project. For example, we held specific thematic meetings about Roma Communities, also trying to disseminate the information we gathered but also different materials coming from other projects and initiatives. Nowadays, and after the first national meeting, this group (now enlarged) will be the main tool for developing all the actions previewed in the project.

 

Some of the activities will be developed (and were agreed) with the active participation of the different members of the group (for instance the structure of the training and the contents of the manual which will be produced during the national working group meetings). During this first meeting a calendar of activities was defined as follows:

 

n   I National Working Group  (28 of the September 2005)

n II National Working Group (18 of the January 2006)

n III National Working Group (15 of the Mars 2006)

n IV National Working Group (19 of the April 2006)

n V National Working Group (01 of the June 2006)

The main conclusions of the meeting were:

  • Lack of information (health indicators) about this minority;

  • Some recent researches reveals that the Roma Communities are the target of health inequalities and are the most disfavoured group in this domain. Some of the authors make reference to the difficulties in the access to the information, more specially information related with the vaccination of the children, the prevention and the treatment of some diseases;

  • The access of these communities to the health services is incipient (very little). A Roma population seems to be not very concern with health an have few preventive habits of health. This is because Health for Roma Communities is just (is similarly) absence of disease. Roma population only appeals to health services in case of extreme necessity, that is, when they are sick and need to be treated;

  • The poor or inadequate nutrition makes them more exposed to serious illnesses; some of them were almost eradicated from the majority of society. At this level there are still many gaps and deficiencies, such as: excess of grease and sugars, absence of schedules and healthy alimentary habits;

  • In what concerns drug addiction and drug traffic, the tradition on marketing selling, the contact with marginalised sectors of the society, its social and economical conditions and the difficult on the access to the information, seem to explain the vulnerability and the spread/enlargement of this practice within Roma Community. These practices within Roma Community contribute for the vulnerability of the gypsy’s families and for the worsening of its situation of exclusion and poverty;

  • Gypsies’ communities present high levels of premature maternity and few (or none) medical assistance on pregnancy or childbirth and they present also a high average number of children. The contraception (birth control) is not  current practice; even so it starts to be more frequent among the youngest women;

  • the standardized functioning of health services it’s an obstacle in the access to theses minority groups and they enhance repressive behaviours quitting them to take some attitudes and increasing the mutual diffidence. Gypsies have proper cultural characteristics that need to be respected or take in consideration in the interaction/intervention with these communities. It’s clear the existence of a mutual ignorance between gypsies communities and health services. This ignorance leads to a hostility resulted of a series of stigmas and fears. Gypsies are characterized as being insubordinate, demand and undisciplined in relation to the functioning of the services and to the medical prescriptions because they don’t believe in medical professionals and in health services. The different perspectives and expectations in relation to the health cares by gypsies and medical professionals, it’s an obstacle to the communication and the interaction between them. It’s the lack of knowledge about gypsy culture and it’s characteristics that difficult the use of the services that could improve its quality of life. By this way the health problems of these communities became worse because of some of their traditions, customs and beliefs. Many of the diseases are related to the supernatural, and so they apply to healers and alternative medicines.

 The National Working group is an important moment because it’s a space of meeting, debate and exchange of experiences and planning of activities. In the scope of this working group we have developed the diagnosis on the current situation of the roma communities, in what concerns health and, at this moment, we are gathering the difficulties and recommendations. This work is being done taking in consideration 4 levels of analysis: 1

  • Public health system

  • Roma communities

  • Health services and specific health areas

  • Health-care professionals

 1) The main difficulties at public health system level are:

  • health inequalities within the population and lack information concerning roma health indicators;

  • the functioning of health system is usually rigid and close;

  • lack of a real work of prevention and awareness of these communities in what concerns health issues;

  • lack of information about cultural diversity;

  • marginalization and exclusion of these members on health public programmes and campaigns

 Facing these difficulties, the participants had presented the following recommendations and suggestion:

  • activities of information and awareness raising promoting the credibility of these services - visits of study;

  • development of studies and researches, at micro level, on health needs;

  • health must be a permanent issue in Project applications and reports

  • construction of a network of health professionals in order to better conduct roma to health services

  • inter-sectoral co-ordination and collaboration with Roma mediator's and health/social professionals;

  • identification of rigid protocols that usually contribute for exclusion and establishment protocols and rules more flexible

  • specific training involving members of gypsies communities in order to better understood theses communities and adapt the services to their needs and characteristics

  • Prevention Campaigns addressed to these communities and developed with their help

  • development of partnerships with different organisations

 2) The main difficulties at Roma Communities level are:

  • distance between the Roma Communities and health services; 

  • less conscience about the importance of education to health;

  • high levels of poverty and low levels of education have a negative influence on the roma health standards;

Facing these difficulties, the participants had presented the following recommendations and suggestions:

  • information/training of the roma communities about the functioning of services;

  • teach the functioning of the diverse services of health, what they can wait of it, how they work and what are the procedures to access to them;

  • cooperation between health services and associations – share experience that can facilitate the relation with the roma population;

  • decentralization of the services of primary heath (mobile units);

  • sessions on health education;

  • implement programmes/strategies to promote quality of life (accomplish basic conditions)

3) The main difficulties at health services and specific health areas are:

  • the functioning of health centres (lack of evaluation and planning and insufficient information);

  • distant relationship between roma communities and health centres;

  • phase of reception (when Gypsies persons arrive to services sometimes they are not very well welcome)

  • lack of family planning

  • question of gender

  • premature maternity (youth pregnancy)

  • lack information about paediatrics issues

 Facing these difficulties, the participants had presented the following recommendations and suggestions:

  • planning and evaluation on the level of satisfaction and information of the users and the professionals ;

  • alternative ways of communication (audiovisual, training of pairs, collaboration with partners of the community);

  • develop communicative skills in the professionals (adapt language and the level of information to give);

  • promote networking (cooperation with local agents – civil society);

  • existence of key professionals for the members of the roma community, in order  to get a more close proximity and confidence between them;

  •  training in interpersonal relationship and cultural diversity issues;

  • individual accompaniment of Roma Community members;

  • informative leaflets and placards;

 4) The main difficulties at health-care level professionals are:

  • the prevalence of prejudices and stereotypes – attribution by the all society of a negative image

  • racism and intolerance (prejudices, stigmatization and discrimination)

  • communications barriers

  • lack of information about the characteristics and culture of this minority among health-care professionals

Facing these difficulties, the participants had presented the following recommendations and suggestions:

  • adaptation of the attendance procedures to the characteristics of the roma population;

  • it is important that the gypsies know the professionals and that these ones work in order to gain it’s confidence;

  • it is necessary to make an effort for knowing this population and thinking about exchange strategies;

  • to prevent technical language and look for on accessible language; 

  • the professionals must have in special consideration the gypsies cultural characteristics (initial training);

  • the base education of health professionals must contemplate the questions of cultural diversity;

 National Working groups