Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  99 / 121 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 121 Next Page
Page Background

97

Headway made in combating discrimination

For further information:

Italian case: Judgement La Barbuta v. munici-

pality of Rome.

http://www.errc.org/article/municipality-of-romecon-

demned- for-la-barbuta-camp-for-the-first-timein-

europe-an-official-roma-only-settlement-ruled-dis-

criminatory/ 4369

Bulgarian case: Judgement CHEZ Razpredele-

nie Bulgaria AD. (Case C-83/14)

For the complete judgment (click here); summary of

the judgment (click here)

Hungarian case: Judgement of the European

Court of Human Rights. Case of BALÁZS v.

HUNGARY

In its judgment of 20 October 2015, the European

Court of Human Rights convicted Hungary of discrimi-

nation for failing to investigate a racist attack against a

Roma man in 2012.

The claimant, a Roma man from Szeged represented

in court by the Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic

Minorities (NEKI), was the victim of a racist attack by a

police official who called him a “dirty Gypsy”.

Based on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) as it

relates to Article 3 (prohibition of inhumane and degrad-

ing treatment) of the Convention for the Protection of

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Mr. Balázs

asserted that the authorities failed to conduct an ef-

fective investigation of a racist attack against him. More

specifically, he argues that they failed to take sufficient

measures to establish a possible racist motive for the

assault.

The court ruled in favour of the claimant and in its judg-

ment pointed out that complaints of racist violence

against Roma must be “vigorously investigated” and in

this case the Hungarian authorities did not do that and

are therefore being held accountable for acting in a dis-

criminatory fashion.

This decision is a positive reference in the defence of

non-discrimination and combating hate crime, not only

for the correct conviction of Hungary

but also because

it establishes the importance of the decisions of the

Fundamental Rights Agency—FRA, of the Organisation

for Security and Co-operation in Europe—OSCE and of

the European Commission against Racism and Intoler-

ance—ECRI of the Council of Europe. It also underscores

the obligation that states are under to conduct effec-

tive investigations to pursue and condemn discrimina-

tion and hate crimes.

The judgement was translated into Spanish and pub-

lished by the Movement against Intolerance in issue 56

of its Analysis Annals.

http://www.movimientocon

-

tralaintolerancia. com/download/cuadernosAnalisis/56.

zip