![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0070.png)
70
Î
Î
It is positive to see that
Roma inclusion is considered in a large number of
ESF and ERDF thematic objectives and investment priorities, beyond the
dedicated Investment Priority 9.2.
This implies substantial progress in
terms of Roma policies and
opens a lot of opportunities to achieve impact
if it is appropriately implemented.
Ensuring that Roma benefit from programmes under other IPs and TOs is
of utmost importance to take advantage of the full range of possibilities
to promote the social inclusion of Roma offered by the ESI Funds in the
2014-2020 programming period.
Î
Î
There are
many different ways to address Roma inclusion, both in terms of
approaches
(‘explicit’, ‘explicit but not exclusive’ or ‘no explicit’ mentions,
‘territorial approach’)
and thematic objectives
(TOs)
and investment
priorities
(IPs).
Î
Î
Now it is
time to translate what is planned into actions that reach Roma
,
and therefore efforts need to be made during the 2014-2020 programming
period to find the best ways to implement what is planned.
In particular it remains to be seen how the different choices made in
terms of TOs/IPs and approaches will be actually implemented and what
will be their impact.
There are two
elements defined in the planning phase that
could largely
determine the impact of the interventions:
›
›
The mention to Roma/Roma communities,
whether it is ‘explicit’,
‘explicit but not exclusive’ or ‘not explicit’.
›
›
The hierarchical importance given to actions
explicitly targeting Roma/
Roma communities, whether they are targeted at the level of priority
axis, specific objective or type of intervention/action.
ASPECTS TO CONSIDER IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE