Informe Discriminación 2016

82 / 117

80
Discriminación y Comunidad gitana 2016
Referencias
• Appiah, K. A. (1990). Racisms. In: D. Goldberg (ed).
Anatomy of racism. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Uni-
versity Press (pp. 3-13).
• Baker, M. (1981). The new racism: conservatives and
the ideology of the tribe. London: Junction Books.
• Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. (1991). Race, nation, class:
ambiguous identities. Verso Books. London.
• Bar-Tal, D. (1989). Delegitimization: the extreme
case of stereotyping and prejudice. In: D. Bar-Tal,
C. F. Graumann, A. Kruglanski, and W. Stroebe (eds).
Stereotyping and prejudice: changing conceptions.
New York: Springer-Verlag, pp.169-183
• Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Causes and consequences of de-
legitimization: models of conflict and ethnocentrism.
Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), pp. 65-81.
• BBC [online]. Available from:
[Accessed 15 March
2007].
• Benedict, R. (1940). Race, science, and politics. New
York: Viking Press.
• Calvo Buezas, T. (2001). ¿España racista? Voces pa-
yas sobre los gitanos. Barcelona: Ed. Anthropos.
• Council of Europe. (2000). Legal Situation of the Roma
in Europe. [online].
XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewHTML.asp?FileID=9676&lang=en
• Chulvi, B. and Pérez, J. A. (2003). Ontologisation
versus discrimination d’une minorité ethnique (les
gitans). Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 2(1),
pp. 6-15.
• European Values Study (1999). “Who would you not
like to have as a neighbour?” quoted according to:
Special Tasks Minister for Social Integration 2003:
Cultural Diversity and Tolerance in Latvia, Riga.
• European Roma Information Office (ERIO). (2004).
European Roma Information Office (ERIO) condemns
anti-Roma media campaign in the UK in the wake of
EU enlargement [online]. Available from:
• European Roma Information Office (ERIO). [online].
Available from:
• IPP/Gallup.(2003). Intoleranta, discriminare si autorita-
rism in opinia publica, September 2003
• Jacquard, A. and Pontalis, J. B. (1984-1985). “Entretrien”
une tête qui ne revient pas” Genre Humain, 11, pp 8-35.
• Legrand, Michel (2004) Les voisins qu’on n’aimerait
pas avoir, par groupe de population, in: Les valeurs
au Luxembourg. Portrait d’une société au tournant du
millénaire, Editions Saint-Paul Luxembourg, p. 348.
• Lucassen, L. and Willems, W. (2001). The weakness
of well ordered societies: Gypsies in Europe, the
Ottoman Empire and India 1400-1914. Paper for the
NIAS-Conference Accommodating Cultural and reli-
gious Differences. [online]. Available from:
clusion.pep.uoi.gr/ROMA/synedria/3/Lucassen.pdf
• Marcu, A. and Chryssochoou, X. (2005). Exclusion of
ethnic groups from the realm of humanity: prejudice
against the Gypsies in Britain and in Romania. Psicolo-
gia Politica, 30, pp. 41-56.
• Nahabedian, M. (2000). All Ethnic Problems Solved?
[online]. Available from:
• Nicolae, V. (2005) Who now remembers the Roma?
A continuing story of exclusion and persecution.
London: Index on Censorship 2, pp. 65-69
• Nicolae, V. (2006). Words that kill. London: Index on
censorship 1. pp.137 -141
• Opotow, S. (1990). Deterring moral exclusion. Journal
of Social Issues, 46(1), pp. 173- 182.
• Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Euro-
pe (OSCE). (2005). Anti-Gypsyism in the European
mass-media. Warsaw: Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe.
• Park, R. E. (1950). Race and culture . Glencoe. IL: The
Free Press. Pehar, D. (2001). Use of ambiguities in
peace agreements. In: J. Kurbalija and H. Slavik (eds).
Language and diplomacy. Malta: DiploProjects, pp.
163-201.
• Pérez, J.A., Chulvi, B., Alonso, R. (2001). When a Majo-
rity Fails to Convert a Minority: The Case of Gypsies.
In F. Butera and G. Mugny. (Eds.). Social influence in
social reality: Promoting individual and social change.
Ashland: Hogrefe and Huber.
• Pérez, J.A., Moscovici, S., Alonso, R. (2002). Natura y
cultura como principio de clasificación social. Anclaje
de representaciones sociales sobre minorías étnicas.
Revista de Psicología Social. 17 (1). 51-67.